 |
Photo courtesy Lory Kenyon.
This image depicts the golf course site to be built. In the foreground is the bonefish flats and the mangrove system, one of the last of its type in the Bahamas. |
No sane coral reef ecologist will tell you this golf course can be built without destroying the reef.
I asked Kathleen Sullivan Sealey "I understand that there is some controversy regarding the development. Why is Michael J. Risk wrong in his assessment, and why are you right?"
She responded, "I don't think Mike Risk really disagreed with anything in the EIA, he said the EIA was good, he just doubted that the developers would follow through."
But everybody knows that is not true. Mike Risk pointed out serious deficiences in the EIA, especially pertaining to the fact that it contained almost nothing about the coral reef!
So how could Sullivan Sealey...possibly...say that?
It is unfathomable that Kathleen Sullivan Sealey did not read Dr. Risk's assessment.
But if she did, how could she possibly tell me otherwise?
It gets worse. Tom Fazio, the golf course designer, in an article for Executive Golfer, is actually suggesting that "I plan to maximize ocean views by placing eight holes in and around the ocean, three on the Sea of Abaco and five on the Atlantic."
Whether he means that he intends to build holes in the ocean, as in on top of the coral reef, or with a good view of the ocean both suggests the developer is not intending to follow through with its EIA plans. The golf course would have to be designed with crafted hills on either side, to keep as few nutrients from escaping as possible.
Despite the impossibility of saving the reef even with crafting hills to control the flow of nutrients, the golf designer, at this late stage in the game, appears clueless about the minimum ecological requirements for designing a golf course adjacent to a coral reef.